Tenumah v. Gonzales , 161 F. App'x 243 ( 2005 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1428
CHRISTIE B. TENUMAH; ARUISANTOBIONE TENUMAH;
O.R.T.; E.L.T.,
Petitioners,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A97-189-684; A97-189-685; A97-189-686; A97-189-687)
Submitted: December 14, 2005 Decided: December 30, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Liam Ge, Columbia, Maryland, for Petitioners. James Arthur Hunolt,
Bryan Stuart Beier, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Christie B. Tenumah and her three children, natives and
citizens of Nigeria, petition for review of an order of the Board
of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying their motion to reconsider
its previous order, which upheld the immigration judge’s denial of
their motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed
the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not
abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8
C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2005). Accordingly, we deny the petition for
review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Tenumah,
No. A97-189-684(L) (B.I.A. Mar. 24, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -