Wright v. McLeod ( 1996 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2473
GREGORY ALONZA WRIGHT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
J. MCLEOD; W. GRAY; SUMTER COUNTY POLICE
DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-94-2827-3-17BD)
Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 15, 1996
Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Alonza Wright, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson,
II, ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
motion for a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunc-
tion ordering Defendants to cease their harassment of him. To the
extent that Appellant appeals from the court's denial of a tempo-
rary restraining order, that order is not appealable. See Virginia
v. Tenneco, Inc., 538 F.2d 1026, 1029-30 (4th Cir. 1976). We have
reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the
magistrate judge's recommendation to deny injunctive relief and
find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. See Direx
Israel, Ltd. v. Breakthrough Medical Corp., 952 F.2d 802, 812-13
(4th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Wright v. McLeod, No. CA-94-2827-3-17BD (D.S.C.
July 11, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2