Laksmono v. Gonzales , 209 F. App'x 292 ( 2006 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1558
IMAWAN LAKSMONO; FLORENSIA SHIERLY UTOMO,
Petitioners,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the
United States,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A96-268-052; A96-268-053)
Submitted: November 13, 2006 Decided: December 11, 2006
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matthew W. Rau, LAW OFFICE OF MATTHEW W. RAU, Arlington, Virginia,
for Petitioners. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General,
James A. Hunolt, Senior Litigation Counsel, Mona Maria Yousif,
OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Imawan Laksmono and Florensia Shierly Utomo, both natives
and citizens of Indonesia, seek review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (Board) denying their motion to reconsider. We
have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the Board
did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R.
§ 1003.2(a), (b) (2006).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Laksmono, Nos.
A96-268-052; A96-268-053 (B.I.A. Apr. 18, 2006). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -