Clayton v. United States , 253 F. App'x 282 ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 06-1976
    DENISE CLAYTON; LEANN HARRIS,
    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,
    Senior District Judge. (5:04-cv-00143-FPS)
    Submitted:   October 29, 2007          Decided:     November 13, 2007
    Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Paul J. Harris, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellants. Sharon
    Lynn Potter, United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia;
    Eileen J. O’Connor, Assistant Attorney General, Kenneth L. Greene,
    Patrick J. Urda, Tax Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
    Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Denise Clayton and Leann Harris appeal the district
    court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the United
    States on their tax refund suit, 
    26 U.S.C. § 7422
     (2000).   At issue
    is whether the proceeds from the settlement of a suit involving an
    inter vivos trust are excludable as income received by inheritance,
    
    26 U.S.C. § 102
    (a) (2000), or as damages received on account of
    personal physical injuries or physical sickness within the meaning
    of 
    26 U.S.C. § 104
    (a)(2) (2000).        We have reviewed the record
    included on appeal as well as the parties’ briefs, and have found
    no reversible error.     We note that the case relied upon by the
    Appellants in their brief, Murphy v. IRS, 
    460 F.3d 79
     (D.C. Cir.
    2006), was vacated on rehearing.   See Murphy v. IRS, 
    493 F.3d 170
    (D.C. Cir. 2007). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
    the district court.    Clayton v. United States, No. 5:04-cv-00143-
    FPS (N.D. W. Va. July 31, 2006).    We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-1976

Citation Numbers: 253 F. App'x 282

Judges: Hamilton, Per Curiam, Shedd, Traxler

Filed Date: 11/13/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/7/2023