Seyoum v. Gonzales , 161 F. App'x 247 ( 2005 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1490
TADDESE AYELE SEYOUM,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A95-899-567)
Submitted: November 21, 2005 Decided: December 30, 2005
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Oti W. Nwosu, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D.
Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Lindemann,
Assistant Director, Christopher C. Fuller, Senior Litigation
Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Taddese Ayele Seyoum, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) denying a motion to reopen. We have reviewed the
administrative record and the Board’s order and find that the Board
did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See
INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). Accordingly, we deny
the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See
In re Seyoum, A95-899-567 (B.I.A. Apr. 7, 2005). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -