United States v. Smithrick ( 1999 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6961
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CRAIG SMITHRICK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CR-94-111-WMN, CA-99-1487-WMN)
Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 21, 1999
Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam
opinion.
Craig Smithrick, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Craig Smithrick appeals the district court’s order denying his
motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999) and 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s memorandum and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal from the
denial of the § 2255 motion, and affirm the appeal from the denial
of the § 2241 petition on the reasoning of the district court. See
United States v. Smithrick, Nos. CR-94-111-WMN; CA-99-1487-WMN (D.
Md. June 23, 1999). We deny Smithrick’s motion for appointment of
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART
2