Burks v. Rushton ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 09-7558
    TROY LUKE BURKS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    COLIE RUSHTON, Unit Warden; PAM SMITH, Mail Clerk; SCOTT
    LEWIS, Unit Major, sued in their official and individual
    capacity,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia.    Henry M. Herlong, Jr.,    Senior
    District Judge. (3:08-cv-03025-HMH)
    Submitted:   February 25, 2010             Decided:   March 3, 2010
    Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Troy Luke Burks, Appellant Pro Se.     Steven Michael Pruitt,
    MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South
    Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Troy Luke Burks appeals the district court’s orders:
    (1) denying his motions to alter or amend judgment, Fed. R. Civ.
    P. 59(e) and for a temporary restraining order and (2) adopting
    the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
    his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (2006) complaint.                   We have reviewed the
    record and find no reversible error.              Accordingly, we affirm for
    the reasons stated by the district court.                Burks v. Rushton, No.
    3:08-cv-03025-HMH   (D.S.C.     July       21,    2009).        We   deny    Burks’
    motions   to   appoint   counsel,      for       stay    pending     appeal,    for
    injunctive relief pending appeal, to stay the mandate and for
    reconsideration of prior order deferring action on his original
    motion for appointment of counsel.               Burks v. Rushton, No. 3:08-
    cv-03025-HMH   (D.S.C.   July   21,    2009).           We   dispense   with   oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-7558

Judges: Duncan, Agee, Hamilton

Filed Date: 3/3/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024