Merriweather v. Warden, Kershaw Correctional Institution , 234 F. App'x 154 ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 07-6536
    WILLIE S. MERRIWEATHER,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    WARDEN, KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston.   Patrick Michael Duffy, District
    Judge. (2:07-cv-00228-PMD)
    Submitted: July 19, 2007                    Decided:   July 25, 2007
    Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Willie S. Merriweather, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Willie S. Merriweather seeks to appeal the district
    court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge
    and denying relief on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2000) petition.                      The
    order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a
    certificate of appealability.             
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2000).           A
    certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial
    showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”                       
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)    (2000).       A   prisoner     satisfies     this   standard    by
    demonstrating         that   reasonable     jurists    would     find   that     any
    assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is
    debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by
    the district court is likewise debatable.              Miller-El v. Cockrell,
    
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484
    (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).                We have
    independently reviewed the record and conclude that Merriweather
    has not made the requisite showing.                   Accordingly, we deny a
    certificate      of    appealability,     deny   Merriweather’s       “Motion    for
    Summary Disposition, Conduct of Investigation,” and dismiss the
    appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-6536

Citation Numbers: 234 F. App'x 154

Judges: Motz, Gregory, Wilkins

Filed Date: 7/25/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024