White v. Warden, Lee Correctional Institution , 460 F. App'x 206 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 11-7130
    MICHAEL ANGEL WHITE,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    WARDEN, Lee Correctional Institution,
    Respondent - Appellee,
    and
    STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
    Respondent.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Aiken.    Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
    Judge. (1:10-cv-01456-JFA)
    Submitted:   December 20, 2011              Decided:   December 23, 2011
    Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Michael Angel White, Appellant Pro Se.     Donald John Zelenka,
    Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Michael      Angel     White    seeks       to    appeal     the    district
    court’s    order    denying      relief    on    his    
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
        (2006)
    petition.       The district court referred this case to a magistrate
    judge pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C.A. § 636
    (b)(1)(B) (West 2006 & Supp.
    2011).     The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied
    and advised White that failure to file timely objections to this
    recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court
    order based upon the recommendation.
    The     timely       filing     of    specific         objections      to    a
    magistrate      judge’s     recommendation         is    necessary        to     preserve
    appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when
    the     parties     have     been     warned       of        the    consequences        of
    noncompliance.        Wright v. Collins, 
    766 F.2d 841
    , 845-46 (4th
    Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 
    474 U.S. 140
     (1985).                            White
    has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after
    receiving proper notice.            Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
    appealability and dismiss the appeal.
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal    contentions       are   adequately       presented        in   the     materials
    before    the    court    and    argument       would   not    aid      the    decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-7130

Citation Numbers: 460 F. App'x 206

Judges: Motz, Duncan, Diaz

Filed Date: 12/23/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024