Furtado v. Montgomery County, Maryland ( 2008 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6194
EDSON FURTADO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND; MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE
DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:07-cv-02755-RDB)
Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 30, 2008
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edson Furtado, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Barry Lattner, COUNTY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Edson Furtado appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Furtado’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Furtado v. Montgomery
County, Md., No. 1:07-cv-02755-RDB (D. Md. filed Jan. 14, 2008 &
entered Jan. 16, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -