Runge v. Barton ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 09-2251
    JON J. RUNGE,
    Plaintiff – Appellant,
    v.
    DR. TOM BARTON, President Greenville Technical College;
    JANIE REID, Dean of Financial Aid Greenville Technical
    College; P. GEORGE BENSON, President College of Charleston;
    DON GRIGGS, Director of Financial Aid of Charleston,
    Defendants – Appellees,
    and
    SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF; MARK SANFORD, Governor of The
    State of South Carolina; GARRISON WALTERS, Executive
    Director South Carolina Commission on Higher Education,
    Defendants.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville.    G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (6:08-cv-00231-GRA)
    Submitted:   February 25, 2010              Decided:   March 2, 2010
    Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jon J. Runge, Appellant Pro Se.       Charles Michael Groves,
    CHAPMAN, HARTER & GROOVES, PA, Greenville, South Carolina;
    Christopher Louis Murphy, STUCKEY LAW OFFICES, PA, Charleston,
    South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Jon       J.   Runge    appeals     the       district     court’s    orders
    accepting       the    recommendations        of    the     magistrate       judge   and
    denying relief on his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (2006) complaint.                              We
    have     reviewed      the    record     and       find     no    reversible      error.
    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
    court.     See Runge v. Sanford, No. 6:08-cv-00231-GRA (Aug. 21 &
    Oct. 2, 2009).         We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before    the    court     and     argument    would      not    aid   the   decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-2251

Filed Date: 3/2/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021