United States v. Olvis ( 2008 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7160
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANTHONY L. OLVIS, a/k/a Tony,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (4:95-cr-00038-RGD-1)
Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: December 1, 2008
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony L. Olvis, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham,
II, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony L. Olvis appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and reconsideration of that
order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we find the district court did not abuse
its discretion in denying the motion. See United States v.
Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (motion under
§ 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion of the district court”);
United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th Cir. 2000).
Thus, we affirm the district court’s orders for the reasons
stated therein. See United States v. Olvis, No. 4:95-cr-00038-
RGD-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 2, 2008; filed Apr. 29, 2008 & entered May
2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2