Teshome v. Ashcroft ( 2003 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2252
ALEHUBEL TESHOME,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A72-378-084)
Submitted: October 29, 2003 Decided: December 15, 2003
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mikre-Michael Ayelle, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter
D. Keisler, Assistant United Attorney General, Emily Radford,
Assistant Director, Office of Immigration Litigation, Mark B.
Stern, Alisa B. Klein, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Alehubel Teshome, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions
for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board).
The order denied his motion to reconsider the Board’s dismissal of
his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s order denying his
applications for asylum and withholding of deportation. We have
reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board
did not abuse its discretion in denying Teshome’s motion to
reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2003). Accordingly, we deny
the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re:
Teshome, No. A72-378-084 (BIA Oct. 3, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2