United States v. Wiggins ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 02-4681
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    MATTHEW JOHN WIGGINS,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
    District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Joseph Robert Goodwin,
    District Judge. (CR-99-199-6-1)
    Submitted:   January 15, 2003             Decided:   January 29, 2003
    Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Edward H. Weis,
    Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for
    Appellant.   Kasey Warner, United States Attorney, Stephanie D.
    Thacker, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West
    Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Matthew   John   Wiggins    appeals   the   district   court’s   order
    revoking his term of supervised release and sentencing him to
    twelve months imprisonment, followed by twenty-four months of
    supervised release, to include home detention.             Wiggins contends
    that his sentence exceeds the statutory maximum provided by 
    18 U.S.C. § 3583
    (e)(3) (2000).           We find that the district court
    properly sentenced Wiggins within the statutory maximum. See United
    States v. Hager, 
    288 F.3d 136
     (4th Cir.) (holding that a defendant
    does not receive credit against the maximum revocation prison term
    for time previously spent on home detention), cert. denied, 
    71 U.S.L.W. 3265
     (U.S. Oct. 15, 2002) (No. 02-6167).
    Accordingly, we affirm Wiggins’ sentence.           We dispense with
    oral   argument    because   the    facts    and   legal   contentions    are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-4681

Filed Date: 1/29/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2014