-
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2074 DESHANTA HINTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LANHAM FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee, and JOHN DOE, JR., General Manager, Lanham Ford Motor Company; PAUL TIMKO, Special Agent for the FBI; KAREN NESTER, Special Agent for the FBI; UNKNOWN FBI AGENTS; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:05-cv-02425-AW) Submitted: August 13, 2007 Decided: August 21, 2007 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. DeShanta Hinton, Appellant Pro Se. John Paul Lynch, Charles Henry Henderson, MCNAMEE, HOSEA, JERNIGAN, KIM, GREENAN & WALKER, PA, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: DeShanta Hinton seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing certain defendants in her
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) suit. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1291(2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292(2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541(1949). In this case, claims remain pending in the district court against several other defendants. The order Hinton seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Baird v. Palmer,
114 F.3d 39, 42 (4th Cir.1997). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED - 3 -
Document Info
Docket Number: 06-2074
Filed Date: 8/21/2007
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 10/31/2014