White v. Johnson ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 08-6029
    DERYLL ALLEN WHITE,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    GENE M. JOHNSON,      Director   of   the   Virginia   Department   of
    Corrections,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
    Judge. (2:07-cv-00140-RAJ-JEB)
    Submitted:   June 26, 2008                      Decided:   July 1, 2008
    Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Deryll Allen White, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey,
    III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,
    Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Deryll Allen White seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    dismissing his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2000) petition.            The order is not
    appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate
    of appealability. 
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2000). A certificate of
    appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the
    denial of a constitutional right.”          
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2) (2000).
    A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable
    jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims
    by   the   district   court    is   debatable    or   wrong    and   that   any
    dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise
    debatable.     Miller-El v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003);
    Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).         We have independently reviewed the
    record and conclude that White has not made the requisite showing.
    Accordingly,    we    deny    White’s   motion    for   a     certificate   of
    appealability and dismiss the appeal.              We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-6029

Judges: King, Duncan, Wilkins

Filed Date: 7/1/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024