Luallen v. Guilford Health Care ( 2004 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1121
LOUISE E. LUALLEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
TINA C. NTUEN; MARIANA WILLIAMS; BRENDA K.
SMITH; VELVET GARRIQUES; LINDA GLASGOW,
Plaintiffs,
versus
GUILFORD HEALTH CARE CENTER; PARENT
CORPORATION MEDICAL FACILITIES OF NORTH
CAROLINA, INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 04-1927
LOUISE E. LUALLEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
TINA C. NTUEN; MARIANA WILLIAMS; BRENDA K.
SMITH; VELVET GARRIQUES; LINDA GLASGOW,
Plaintiffs,
versus
GUILFORD HEALTH CARE CENTER; PARENT
CORPORATION MEDICAL FACILITIES OF NORTH
CAROLINA, INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CA-02-738-1)
Submitted: November 24, 2004 Decided: December 20, 2004
Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Romallus O. Murphy, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant.
Patricia Williams Goodson, KILPATRICK STOCKTON L.L.P., Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Louise E. Luallen appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on her discrimination claims based on Title VII of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (2000),
and denying her motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the denial of Luallen’s Title VII claims on the reasoning of
the district court. See Luallen v. Guilford Health Care Ctr., No.
CA-02-738-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 19, 2003; June 15, 2004). Moreover, we
conclude that Luallen waived her right to appeal the district
court’s denial of her Rule 60(b) motion by failing to comply with
Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(9)(A). We grant Appellees’ motions to submit
these appeals on the briefs and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -