United States v. Perez-Torres , 157 F. App'x 593 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 05-7148
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    BRAULIO PEREZ-TORRES, a/k/a Jose Luis Garcia-
    Lopez, a/k/a Rufus,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, District Judge.
    (CR-01-38; CA-05-365-7-NKM-MFU)
    Submitted:   November 22, 2005            Decided:   December 6, 2005
    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Braulio Perez-Torres, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr.,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia,
    for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Braulio Perez-Torres seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order dismissing as untimely his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2255
     (2000) motion.
    
    28 U.S.C. § 2244
    (d)(1) (2000).          The order is not appealable unless
    a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability.
    
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c) (2000).          A certificate of appealability will
    not   issue    absent     “a   substantial     showing    of   the    denial   of    a
    constitutional right.”         
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2) (2000).            A prisoner
    satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists
    would find the district court’s assessment of his constitutional
    claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by
    the district court are also debatable or wrong.                    See Miller-El v.
    Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).
    We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Perez-
    Torres   has     not    demonstrated    error     in     the   district    court’s
    procedural      ruling.        Accordingly,     we     deny    a    certificate     of
    appealability and dismiss the appeal.                   We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-7148

Citation Numbers: 157 F. App'x 593

Filed Date: 12/6/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2014