McGlohon v. City of Dallas , 210 F. App'x 236 ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 06-2139
    DOUGLAS S. MCGLOHON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CITY OF DALLAS, Chief of the Dallas Police
    Department,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. James C. Dever III,
    District Judge. (2:06-mc-00004-D)
    Submitted: December 14, 2006              Decided:   December 18, 2006
    Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Douglas S. McGlohon, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Douglas S. McGlohon seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order   denying   his   application   for   leave   to   proceed   in   forma
    pauperis.   We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because
    the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
    Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the
    district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.
    App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal
    period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period
    under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).        This appeal period is “mandatory
    and jurisdictional.”      Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr., 
    434 U.S. 257
    , 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 
    361 U.S. 220
    ,
    229 (1960)).
    The district court’s order was entered on the docket on
    September 6, 2006.      The notice of appeal was filed on October 10,
    2006.   Because McGlohon failed to file a timely notice of appeal or
    to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny
    leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal.                We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-2139

Citation Numbers: 210 F. App'x 236

Judges: Michael, Gregory, Shedd

Filed Date: 12/18/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024