Ibrahim Jabbar v. C. Woody , 459 F. App'x 279 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 10-7506
    IBRAHIM ABDULLAH JABBAR,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    C. T. WOODY, Sheriff; CAPT. ROBINSON, Medical Dept. Sup.;
    DR. FURMAN, Head Doctor, RCJ; DEPUTY HARRIS, Mailroom; NURSE
    FORD, Medical Dept. RCJ; SGT. JONES, Grievance Coordinator;
    LT. COLONEL BURNETT, Jail Operations; MAJ. ROBINSON, Medical
    Dept. Supervisor; CAPT. MCREA, Jail Operations RCJ; CHAPLAIN
    PRUITT, Under Sheriff, RCJ,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.    T.S. Ellis, III, Senior
    District Judge. (1:09-cv-00246-TSE-TCB)
    Submitted:   December 20, 2011            Decided:   December 22, 2011
    Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Ibrahim Abdullah Jabbar, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Douglas Lane,
    THOMPSON MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Ibrahim Abdullah Jabbar appeals the district court’s
    orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. *
    We   have   reviewed   the   record   and   find   no   reversible   error.
    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
    court.      Jabbar v. Woody, No. 1:09-cv-00246-TSE-TCB (E.D. Va.
    filed Sept. 29, 2009 & entered Sept. 30, 2009; filed Sept. 9,
    2010 & entered Sept. 10, 2010).           We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    *
    Jabbar filed an untimely notice of appeal.  This court
    subsequently remanded this case to the district court for a
    determination as to whether Jabbar was entitled to a reopening
    of the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). See Jabbar
    v.   Woody,   432  F.  App’x  224  (4th  Cir.   May 25,  2011)
    (unpublished). Because the district court found that Jabbar is
    entitled to the benefit of Rule 4(a)(6), we address the appeal
    on the merits.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-7506

Citation Numbers: 459 F. App'x 279

Judges: Motz, Duncan, Diaz

Filed Date: 12/22/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024