United States v. Joseph Guarascio , 627 F. App'x 194 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 15-7578
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    JOSEPH MICHAEL GUARASCIO,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever, III,
    Chief District Judge. (7:09-cr-00109-D-1; 7:11-cv-00044-D)
    Submitted:   December 17, 2015            Decided:   December 22, 2015
    Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Joseph Michael Guarascio, Appellant Pro Se. Shailika S. Kotiya,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Ethan A. Ontjes, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Joseph      Michael       Guarascio       seeks     to    appeal       the    district
    court’s    order     denying     his    Fed.     R.    Civ.    P.     60(b)   motion       for
    reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on
    his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2255
     (2012) motion.                   The order is not appealable
    unless    a    circuit       justice    or   judge      issues        a   certificate       of
    appealability.       
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1)(B) (2012).                      A certificate
    of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of
    the denial of a constitutional right.”                        
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)
    (2012).       When the district court denies relief on the merits, a
    prisoner       satisfies        this    standard         by         demonstrating       that
    reasonable      jurists        would    find      that        the     district       court’s
    assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong.
    Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000); see Miller-El v.
    Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003).                    When the district court
    denies     relief       on     procedural        grounds,       the       prisoner         must
    demonstrate      both    that     the    dispositive          procedural          ruling    is
    debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the
    denial of a constitutional right.                Slack, 
    529 U.S. at 484-85
    .
    We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
    Guarascio has not made the requisite showing.                             Accordingly, we
    deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.                                 We
    dispense      with    oral      argument       because        the     facts   and      legal
    2
    contentions   are   adequately   presented   in   the   materials   before
    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-7578

Citation Numbers: 627 F. App'x 194

Judges: Diaz, Harris, Hamilton

Filed Date: 12/22/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024