Dreher v. South Carolina , 235 F. App'x 101 ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 07-6422
    GEORGE DREHER,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; HENRY MCMASTER,
    Attorney General; WILLIAM WHITE, Warden,
    Respondents -Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville.   Patrick Michael Duffy, District
    Judge. (6:06-cv-01298-PMD)
    Submitted: July 24, 2007                    Decided:   July 31, 2007
    Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    George Dreher, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Derrick K.
    McFarland, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
    Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    George Dreher seeks to appeal the district court’s order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2000) petition.          The order is not
    appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate
    of appealability. 
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2000). A certificate of
    appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the
    denial of a constitutional right.”         
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2) (2000).
    A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable
    jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims
    by   the   district   court   is   debatable    or   wrong   and   that   any
    dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise
    debatable.    Miller-El v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003);
    Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).        We have independently reviewed the
    record and conclude that Dreher has not made the requisite showing.
    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
    appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-6422

Citation Numbers: 235 F. App'x 101

Judges: Wilkinson, Traxler, Duncan

Filed Date: 7/31/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024