William Cash v. James Metts ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 13-6238
    WILLIAM AUSTON CASH,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    JAMES METTS; E. V. KIRKLAND; DAN DOE; JOHN DOE; BENNETT E.
    CASTO,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville. Kevin Frank McDonald, Magistrate
    Judge. (6:12-cv-01815-MGL-KFM)
    Submitted:   June 20, 2013                 Decided:   June 26, 2013
    Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    William Auston Cash, Appellant Pro Se.    Justin Tyler Bagwell,
    William Henry Davidson, II, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia,
    South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    William    Auston    Cash       seeks       to    appeal      the    magistrate
    judge’s order denying his motions to compel discovery, to depose
    each defendant, and to seal the record in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
    (2006)     civil      rights      action.            This        court       may        exercise
    jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006),
    and   certain      interlocutory       and        collateral          orders,      28    U.S.C.
    § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
    Loan Corp., 
    337 U.S. 541
    , 545-46 (1949).                             The order that Cash
    seeks    to   appeal    is   neither      a       final    order      nor    an    appealable
    interlocutory or collateral order.                    Accordingly, we dismiss the
    appeal for lack of jurisdiction.                   We deny Cash’s motion for the
    appointment      of     counsel     and       for     transcripts           at     government
    expense.      We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal    contentions      are   adequately           presented         in   the     materials
    before   this    court    and     argument         would       not   aid    the    decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-6238

Judges: Gregory, Duncan, Davis

Filed Date: 6/26/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024