United States v. Hammoude ( 2005 )

PER CURIAM:

Mohammed Hammoude appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for termination of supervised release. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion or reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Hammoude, CR-00-9-A (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 10, 2005; entered Jan. 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED