Kimble v. Montgomery Cnty Bd ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 02-2257
    JOYCE S. KIMBLE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MONTGOMERY   COUNTY    BOARD   OF    EDUCATION;
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; MONTGOMERY
    COUNTY GOVERNMENT; JERRY D. WEAST, Dr.,
    Superintendent,   Montgomery    County   Public
    Schools; PAUL VANCE, Dr., Superintendent,
    District of Columbia Public Schools; KATHERINE
    GUTTERMAN, Division of Insurance & Retirement,
    Montgomery   County    Public    Schools;   ANN
    KAMENSTEIN,    Human    Resources    Compliance
    Specialist, Montgomery County Public Schools;
    GARY LEVINE, Montgomery County Public Schools,
    Department of Human Resources; ELIZABETH
    ARONS,    Dr.,    Associate    Superintendent,
    Montgomery County Public Schools; RAE WHITE,
    Gaithersburg High School; FRED S. EVANS,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
    01-3715-PJM)
    Submitted:   January 16, 2003             Decided:   January 22, 2003
    Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Joyce S. Kimble, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia Prestigiacomo Via,
    Assistant County Attorney, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Joyce S. Kimble appeals the district court’s orders denying
    relief on her 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (2000) complaint and denying
    reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
    error.    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court.    See Kimble v. Montgomery County Bd. of Educ., No. CA-01-
    3715-PJM (D. Md. July 31, 2002; Oct. 2, 2002).          We dispense with
    oral   argument   because   the   facts   and   legal   contentions   are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-2257

Filed Date: 1/22/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014