United States v. Brewer , 302 F. App'x 209 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 08-6691
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    HARVEY J. BREWER, JR.,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:07-cv-
    02842-AMD; 1:04-cr-00215-AMD-2)
    Submitted:   October 17, 2008             Decided:   December 9, 2008
    Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Harvey J. Brewer, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Harvey Brewer, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s
    orders denying relief on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2255
     (2000) motion and his
    Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration.               The orders are
    not    appealable    unless   a   circuit     justice   or    judge   issues     a
    certificate of appealability.           
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2000).           A
    certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial
    showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”                     
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)   (2000).      A   prisoner    satisfies      this   standard    by
    demonstrating       that   reasonable     jurists   would      find   that     any
    assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is
    debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by
    the district court is likewise debatable.           Miller-El v. Cockrell,
    
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484
    (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).              We have
    independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brewer has not
    made   the   requisite     showing.      Accordingly,     although    we     grant
    Brewer’s motion to amend his informal brief, we deny a certificate
    of appealability and dismiss the appeal.            We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-6691

Citation Numbers: 302 F. App'x 209

Judges: Traxler, Gregory, Duncan

Filed Date: 12/9/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024