-
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6865 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANDREW PHENIX BROWN, a/k/a Bubba Brown, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-97-184-V, CA-99-254-3-2-V) Submitted: November 26, 2003 Decided: December 23, 2003 Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Noell Peter Tin, Carole Melissa Owen, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Andrew Phenix Brown, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2255(2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability.
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell,
537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 374, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,
252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied,
534 U.S. 941(2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Document Info
Docket Number: 02-6865
Citation Numbers: 85 F. App'x 902
Filed Date: 12/23/2003
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 10/30/2014