Hightower v. Warden, McCormick Correctional Institution , 302 F. App'x 131 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 08-7682
    DAVID HIGHTOWER,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    WARDEN, McCormick Correctional Institution,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
    Judge. (2:07-cv-00063-CMC)
    Submitted:    November 20, 2008             Decided:   December 2, 2008
    Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    David Hightower, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    David Hightower seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order denying relief on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2000) petition.
    The    district    court   referred      this    case   to     a    magistrate      judge
    pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 636
    (b)(1)(B) (2000).                          The magistrate
    judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Hightower
    that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation
    could waive appellate review of a district court order based
    upon the recommendation.            Despite this warning, Hightower failed
    to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation.
    The     timely      filing    of     specific          objections      to    a
    magistrate       judge’s   recommendation         is    necessary         to     preserve
    appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when
    the     parties     have     been     warned      of     the        consequences        of
    noncompliance.          Wright v. Collins, 
    766 F.2d 841
    , 845-46 (4th
    Cir.    1985);    see    also    Thomas v.      Arn,    
    474 U.S. 140
         (1985).
    Hightower has waived appellate review by failing to timely file
    specific objections after receiving proper notice.                         See United
    States    v.     Midgette,      
    478 F.3d 616
    ,    622    (4th       Cir.     2007).
    Accordingly, we deny Hightower’s motion for a certificate of
    appealability and dismiss the appeal.
    2
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal    contentions   are   adequately   presented    in   the    materials
    before   the   court   and   argument   would   not   aid   the   decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-7682

Citation Numbers: 302 F. App'x 131

Judges: Motz, Gregory, Hamilton

Filed Date: 12/2/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024