Ibrahim v. District of Columbia ( 1996 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7492
JIBRIL LUQMAN IBRAHIM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 95-7493
JIBRIL LUQMAN IBRAHIM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT CEFAIL & ASSOCIATES; THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA; SHARON PRATT KELLY, Mayor; BERNARD
BRAXTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
(CA-94-1170-CV-2, CA-94-1040-CV-2)
Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 5, 1996
Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior
Circuit Judge
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jibril Luqman Ibrahim, Appellant Pro Se. Garland Pinkston, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Washington, D.C.; Cary D. Pollak,
Judith K. Rayner, Eleanor Louise Rhodes Phillips, Martin L.
Grossman, OFFICE OF CORPORATION COUNSEL, Washington, D.C.; Robin C.
Alexander, UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Washington,
D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's transfer of his claims
to the District Court for the District of Columbia pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1404(a) (1988). Because the order is not immediately
appealable, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See
Ellicott Mach. Corp. v. Modern Welding Co., 502 F.2d 178, 180 (4th
Cir. 1974).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
*
Accordingly, we also deny Appellant's motion for summary
disposition or reversal in No. 95-7493.
3