United States v. Warren Boardley, A/K/A Black ( 1992 )

963 F.2d 368

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Warren BOARDLEY, a/k/a Black, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-6658.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 8, 1992
Decided: May 27, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CR-88-386-JFM, CA-91-1690-JFM)

Warren Boardley, Appellant Pro Se.

Breckinridge Long Willcox, United States Attorney, Geoffrey Robert Garinther, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Warren Boardley appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Boardley, Nos. CR-88-386-JFM, CA-91-1690-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 29, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED