United States v. Brewington ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 04-6298
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    RICHARD ANGELO BREWINGTON,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
    District Judge. (CR-01-160)
    Submitted:   June 10, 2004                 Decided:   June 18, 2004
    Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    District Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Richard Angelo Brewington, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Witcover
    Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Richard Angelo Brewington seeks to appeal the district
    court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 
    28 U.S.C. § 2255
     (2000).      An appeal may not be taken from the final order in
    a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a
    certificate of appealability.            
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2000).                 A
    certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial
    showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”                              
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)     (2000).      A    prisoner    satisfies        this    standard     by
    demonstrating       that   reasonable      jurists       would      find       that   his
    constitutional      claims     are   debatable     and     that    any     dispositive
    procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or
    wrong.     See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336 (2003);
    Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683 (4th Cir. 2001).              We have independently reviewed the
    record and conclude that Brewington has not made the requisite
    showing.       Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
    dismiss the appeal.           We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts    and    legal   contentions     are     adequately    presented          in   the
    materials      before   the    court    and     argument    would        not    aid   the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-6298

Filed Date: 6/18/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021