Ham v. Ozmint ( 2010 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7216
ANGELO B. HAM, a/k/a Angelo Bernard Ham,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JON OZMINT; ANTHONY J. PADULA; JOHN J. BROOKS; BRUCE
OBERMAN; RONNIE CRIBB; DARRYL CAIN, Sergeant of SMU at
L.C.I.; CHRISTOPHER GODFREY, Officer of SMU at L.C.I.,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, Chief District
Judge. (6:10-cv-01095-DCN-KFM)
Submitted: December 16, 2010 Decided: December 28, 2010
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Angelo B. Ham, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Barry Johnson, LEE
ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Angelo B. Ham appeals the district court’s
interlocutory order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying Ham’s motion for a preliminary
injunction. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. See Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc.,
129 S. Ct. 365, 374 (2008). Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Ham v. Ozmint, No. 6:10-
cv-01095-DCN-KFM (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
We have jurisdiction over this appeal from an
interlocutory order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) (2006).
2