United States v. Richardson ( 1999 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6298
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CAROL RICHARDSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-90-105-N, CA-97-149-2)
Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: June 18, 1999
Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Barry McCracken, COOK & MCCRACKEN, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellant. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney,
Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Carol Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying
her motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)). We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See United States v. Richardson, Nos. CR-90-105-N; CA-97-
149-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 1999). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___,
1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2