Thompson v. Guilford Cnty ( 2000 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7297
RODNEY EUGENE THOMPSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; JOSEPH
G. BURDZY, Deputy Sheriff; DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR
VEHICLES; WINSTON-SALEM CITY POLICE DEPART-
MENT; D. G. PROCTOR, Deputy Sheriff; FORSYTH
COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CA-98-253-1)
Submitted: April 27, 2000 Decided: May 2, 2000
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodney Eugene Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Susan D. Moore, COUNTY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Greensboro, North Carolina; Christine Marion
Ryan, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh,
North Carolina; Gusti Wiesenfeld Frankel, Allan R. Gitter, WOMBLE,
CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Rodney Eugene Thompson appeals the district court’s order de-
nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no revers-
ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. See Thompson v. Guilford County Sheriff’s Dep’t, No.
CA-98-253-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 1999). Thompson’s motion to have
this court review the original record is granted. We deny Thomp-
son’s motion for the appointment of counsel and deny the motion for
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2