Barry v. Gonzales ( 2007 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1757
MADIOU BARRY,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (No. A96-085-139)
Submitted: June 20, 2007 Decided: July 13, 2007
Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kell Enow, LAW OFFICES OF ENOW AND PATCHA, Silver Spring, Maryland,
for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General,
James A. Hunolt, Senior Litigation Counsel, Kristin K. Edison,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Madiou Barry, a native and citizen of Guinea, seeks
review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board)
denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the
administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its
discretion in denying Barry’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a),
(b) (2006).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Barry, No. A96-085-139
(B.I.A. June. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -