Mills v. Owens ( 1999 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6761
ALBERT CURTIS MILLS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MR. OWENS,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 98-6762
ALBERT CURTIS MILLS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHNNIE WATKINS,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 98-6913
ALBERT CURTIS MILLS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MR. OWENS,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 98-6920
ALBERT CURTIS MILLS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MR. OWENS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
97-3334-DKC, CA-97-3335-DKC)
Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 17, 1999
Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Nos. 98-6761 and 98-6762 dismissed and Nos. 98-6913 and 98-6920
affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Albert Curtis Mills, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Gloria Wilson Shelton, David Phelps Kennedy,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Albert Curtis Mills appeals various district court orders in
two 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) actions. We have reviewed
the records and the district court’s opinions and find no revers-
ible error. We dismiss the appeals in Nos. 98-6761 and 98-6762,
because Mills seeks to appeal non-existent orders. In Nos. 98-6913
and 98-6920, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Mills v. Owens; Mills v. Watkins, Nos. CA-97-3334-DKC; CA-97-3335-
DKC (D. Md. June 4 & 5, 1998). We dispense with oral argument be-
cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
Nos. 98-6761/98-6762 - DISMISSED
Nos. 98-6913/98-6920 - AFFIRMED
3