St. Clair v. DOWCP ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                                 UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 06-1485
    PATRICIA ST. CLAIR, as personal representative
    of the estate of John St. Clair,
    Petitioner,
    versus
    DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
    PROGRAMS; CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY,
    Respondents.
    No. 06-1628
    CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY,
    Petitioner,
    DIRECTOR,    OFFICE    OF   WORKERS’   COMPENSATION
    PROGRAMS,
    Party-in-interest,
    versus
    PATRICIA ST. CLAIR, as personal representative
    of the estate of John St. Clair,
    Respondent.
    On Petitions for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
    (05-548-BLA)
    Submitted:   November 17, 2006           Decided:   January 18, 2007
    Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Patricia St. Clair, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent Pro Se. Patricia
    May Nece, Barry H. Joyner, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
    Washington, D.C., for Respondent Director.        William Steele
    Mattingly, Ashley M. Harman, JACKSON & KELLY, PLLC, Morgantown,
    West Virginia, for Respondent/Cross-Petitioner Consolidation Coal
    Company.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    - 2 -
    PER CURIAM:
    In No. 06-1485, claimant seeks review of the Benefits
    Review     Board’s    (“Board”)      decision   and   order      affirming      the
    administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of black lung benefits
    pursuant    to   
    30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945
        (2000).     In    No.     06-1628,
    Consolidation     Coal   Company     cross-petitions      for    review    of   the
    Board’s affirmance of the ALJ’s conclusion that St. Clair’s claim
    for benefits was timely filed.          Our review of the record discloses
    that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is
    without reversible error.         Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
    stated by the Board.      St. Clair v. Director, OWCP, No. 05-548-BLA
    (B.R.B. Mar. 28, 2006).        We deny St. Clair’s motion to expedite the
    appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    - 3 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-1485

Filed Date: 1/18/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2014