Persson v. Credit Bureau of Southern Virginia, Inc. , 51 F. App'x 424 ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 02-2212
    CHARLES M. PERSSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CREDIT    BUREAU       OF    SOUTHERN   VIRGINIA,
    INCORPORATED,
    Defendant - Appellee,
    and
    AMERICREDIT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED;
    REGIONAL   ACCEPTANCE  CORPORATION;   VICTORY
    NISSAN OF RICHMOND, INCORPORATED,
    Parties in Interest.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
    District Judge. (MC-02-8-3)
    Submitted:    November 21, 2002           Decided:     November 27, 2002
    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Charles M. Persson, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Charles Persson appeals from orders of the District Court for
    the Eastern District of Virginia denying Persson’s requests for the
    issuance of a subpoena relating to a complaint he filed in the
    District Court for the Western District of Virginia.   He also asks
    this court to direct the Western District to hold his case in
    abeyance pending resolution of this appeal.      Our review of the
    record and the pertinent district court dockets reveals that
    Persson’s underlying complaint was dismissed with prejudice in the
    Western District following a settlement reached by the parties.
    This action renders Persson’s claim before this court no longer
    justiciable.   Accordingly, we deny Persson’s motion to direct that
    his case be held in abeyance, and we dismiss the appeal as moot.
    See Leonard v. Hammond, 
    804 F.2d 838
    , 842 (4th Cir. 1986).      We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-2212

Citation Numbers: 51 F. App'x 424

Judges: Niemeyer, Williams, Traxler

Filed Date: 11/27/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024