Wilkins v. Henderson ( 1999 )

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2191 MICHAEL D. WILKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JUDGE HENDERSON; WOODROW P. LIPSCOMB; HONOR- ABLE WILLIAM SUGG; HONORABLE CHARLES MCCOR- MICK; JUDICIAL INQUIRY AND REVIEW COMMISSION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-97-899) Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 21, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael D. Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se. Anton Joseph Stelly, William S. Smithers, Jr., THOMPSON, SMITHERS, NEWMAN & WADE, Richmond, Virginia; Gregory E. Lucyk, Claude Alexander Allen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Michael D. Wilkins appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for default judgment and for rehearing. We have re- viewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Wilkins v. Henderson, No. CA-97-899 (E.D. Va. June 16, 1999; Aug. 4, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2