Lora v. Hollenhorst ( 2006 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7658
WILFREDO GONZALEZ LORA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THOMAS M. HOLLENHORST, Official Capacity;
WILLIAM FITZPATRICK, Official Capacity;
TIMOTHY MCGRATH, Official Capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-05-738-1)
Submitted: July 28, 2006 Decided: August 16, 2006
Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district court’s
orders denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v.
Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388(1971), and his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Lora v. Hollenhorst, No.
CA-05-738-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 5, 2005 & entered July 6, 2005;
filed Aug. 1, 2005 & entered Aug. 2, 2005). We deny Lora’s motion
to consolidate and dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -