Mancho v. Ashcroft , 82 F. App'x 842 ( 2003 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1201
PRUDENCIA MANCHO,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United
States,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A72-725-653)
Submitted: November 26, 2003 Decided: December 18, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Morton Sklar, WORLD ORGANIZATION AGAINST TORTURE, USA, Washington,
D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General,
Mark C. Walters, Assistant Director, James E. Grimes, Office of
Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Prudencia Mancho, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions
for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
(“Board”) dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s order
denying her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have
reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board
did not abuse its discretion in upholding the immigration judge’s
denial of Mancho’s motion to reopen. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S.
314, 323-24 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review
on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Mancho, No. A72-725-653
(B.I.A. Jan. 22, 2003). We note that the Attorney General has
filed a motion for summary affirmance in this case. Because we
find that this is not an “extraordinary case” warranting summary
disposition, we deny the motion. See 4th Cir. R. 37(f). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2