John McPartlin v. Althea Roache-McDonald ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 15-6574
    JOHN JOSEPH MCPARTLIN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    ALTHEA ROACHE-MCDONALD, DMD-CDO Petersburg Correctional
    Complex;    PATRICIA    STANSBERRY,    Warden, Petersburg
    Correctional Complex; MS. LEVISTER (JANE DOE), Assistant
    Warden, Petersburg Correctional Complex,
    Defendants – Appellees,
    and
    ERNEST PONRAJ, DDS Petersburg Correctional Complex,
    Defendant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.    Mark S. Davis, District
    Judge. (2:11-cv-00620-MSD-TEM)
    Submitted:   December 17, 2015             Decided:   December 21, 2015
    Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    John Joseph McPartlin, Appellant Pro Se.     Virginia Lynn Van
    Valkenburg, Susan Lynn Watt, Assistant United States Attorneys,
    Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    John Joseph McPartlin appeals the district court’s order
    denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
    Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 
    403 U.S. 388
    (1971),     and    the   court’s      subsequent       order       denying     McPartlin’s
    Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend that judgment.
    We   have    reviewed     the       record    and    find     no     reversible       error.
    Accordingly,        although    we        grant     leave    to      proceed     in   forma
    pauperis,     we    affirm     for    the    reasons        stated    by   the    district
    court.      See McPartlin v. Roache-McDonald, No. 2:11-cv-00620-MSD-
    TEM (E.D. Va. Mar. 31, 2015 & Apr. 22, 2015).                         We dispense with
    oral   argument       because       the    facts     and     legal     contentions       are
    adequately        presented    in    the     materials       before    this      court   and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-6574

Filed Date: 12/21/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2015