United States v. Samuel Barrington ( 2015 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7307
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SAMUEL LEE BARRINGTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:12-cr-00197-CCE-1; 1:13-cv-00510-CCE-JLW)
Submitted: December 18, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015
Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel Lee Barrington, Appellant Pro Se. Harry L. Hobgood,
Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Stephen Thomas Inman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Lee Barrington appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The district
court granted a certificate of appealability on one issue:
whether Barrington was entitled to resentencing following the
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Johnson, 135 S. Ct.
2551 (2015). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Barrington, Nos. 1:12-cr-
00197-CCE-1; 1:13-cv-00510-CCE-JLW (M.D.N.C. July 31, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2