United States v. Jason McCright , 627 F. App'x 217 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 15-7600
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff – Appellee,
    v.
    JASON L. MCCRIGHT,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News.     Rebecca Beach Smith,
    Chief District Judge. (4:09-cr-00022-RBS-TEM-1)
    Submitted:   December 17, 2015            Decided:   December 22, 2015
    Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jason L. McCright, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham,
    II, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia,
    for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    In   November    2014,       Jason    L.    McCright   filed    an    
    18 U.S.C. § 3582
    (c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction.                             Because
    McCright was sentenced as a career offender, Amendment 782 to
    the   Sentencing      Guidelines,         which    reduced   the     offense     levels
    applicable to drug offenses, did not have the effect of lowering
    his applicable Guidelines range.                  The district court therefore
    denied the motion.        In September 2015, McCright filed a second
    § 3582(c)(2) motion, again seeking the benefit of Amendment 782.
    The district court denied relief, and McCright now appeals.
    As the district court correctly concluded that it lacked
    authority    to   grant   a    motion       to    reconsider   its     ruling      on   a
    § 3582(c)(2) motion, see United States v. Goodwyn, 
    596 F.3d 233
    ,
    235-36 (4th Cir. 2010), we affirm the district court’s order.
    We also deny McCright’s motion to appoint counsel.                         We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately    presented       in    the    materials    before     this     court   and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-7600

Citation Numbers: 627 F. App'x 217

Judges: Diaz, Harris, Hamilton

Filed Date: 12/22/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024