American Heartland Port, Inc. v. American Port Holdings, Inc. , 624 F. App'x 110 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 14-1801
    AMERICAN HEARTLAND PORT, INCORPORATED;      JO   LYNN   KRAINA;
    SHELLEY REED; MISTY SHANNON,
    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    v.
    AMERICAN    PORT    HOLDINGS,    INCORPORATED,    a    Delaware
    corporation;   PATRICK   NICHOLAS   DICARLO,   an   individual;
    ARCELORMITTAL    WEIRTON  LLC,   a   corporation;   DANIEL   L.
    DICKERSON, individually; ANDREW S. FELLOWS, individually;
    JAMES C. BRECKINRIDGE, individually,
    Defendants – Appellees,
    and
    ALLIED INVESTMENT PARTNERS PJSC, a foreign corporation;
    ARCELORMITTAL   WEIRTON   INCORPORATED;  STANLEY   BALLAS,
    individually; CHANNEL POINT PARTNERS, a corporation; JAMES
    MARTODAM, individually,
    Defendants.
    No. 14-1809
    AMERICAN HEARTLAND PORT, INCORPORATED;      JO   LYNN   KRAINA;
    SHELLEY REED; MISTY SHANNON,
    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    v.
    AMERICAN    PORT    HOLDINGS,    INCORPORATED,    a    Delaware
    corporation;   PATRICK   NICHOLAS   DICARLO,   an   individual;
    ARCELORMITTAL   WEIRTON  LLC,   a  corporation; DANIEL L.
    DICKERSON, individually; ANDREW S. FELLOWS, individually;
    JAMES C. BRECKINRIDGE, individually,
    Defendants – Appellees,
    and
    ALLIED INVESTMENT PARTNERS PJSC, a foreign corporation;
    ARCELORMITTAL   WEIRTON  INCORPORATED;   JAMES   MARTODAM,
    individually; STANLEY BALLAS, individually; CHANNEL POINT
    PARTNERS, a corporation,
    Defendants.
    No. 14-2249
    AMERICAN HEARTLAND PORT, INCORPORATED;      JO   LYNN   KRAINA;
    SHELLEY REED; MISTY SHANNON,
    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    v.
    AMERICAN    PORT    HOLDINGS,    INCORPORATED,    a    Delaware
    corporation;   PATRICK   NICHOLAS   DICARLO,   an   individual;
    ARCELORMITTAL    WEIRTON  LLC,   a   corporation;   DANIEL   L.
    DICKERSON, individually; ANDREW S. FELLOWS, individually;
    JAMES C. BRECKINRIDGE, individually,
    Defendants – Appellees,
    and
    ALLIED INVESTMENT PARTNERS PJSC, a foreign corporation;
    ARCELORMITTAL   WEIRTON  INCORPORATED;   JAMES   MARTODAM,
    individually; STANLEY BALLAS, individually; CHANNEL POINT
    PARTNERS, a corporation,
    Defendants.
    2
    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.     Frederick P. Stamp,
    Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:11-cv-00050-FPS-JES)
    Submitted:   November 24, 2015        Decided:   December 15, 2015
    Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    John Hampton Tinney, Jr., TINNEY LAW FIRM, PLLC, Charleston,
    West Virginia, for Appellants. Wendy G. Adkins, Stephen Michael
    LaCagnin, JACKSON KELLY, PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia; Dennis
    Joseph Powers, Kenneth L. Schmetterer, DLA PIPER US LLP,
    Chicago, Illinois, for Appellees.      Patrick Nicholas DiCarlo,
    Newport Beach, California, Appellee Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    3
    PER CURIAM:
    American   Heartland   Port,   Inc.,    Jo   Lynn   Kraina,     Shelley
    Reed, and Misty Shannon (collectively, Plaintiffs) appeal the
    district court’s order dismissing their claims against Patrick
    Nicholas DiCarlo (No. 14-1801) and the order granting summary
    judgment to ArcelorMittal Weirton, LLC (No. 14-1809). *              We have
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.            Accordingly,
    we affirm.    Am. Heartland Port, Inc. v. Am. Port Holdings, Inc.,
    No. 5:11-cv-00050-FPS-JES (N.D. W. Va. Mar. 21, 2014; July 17,
    2014 & Oct. 8, 2014).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions   are   adequately   presented   in   the    materials    before
    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    * Plaintiffs also noted an appeal of the district court’s
    order denying their motion for new trial, entered on October 8,
    2014 (No. 14-2249).    Because Plaintiffs failed to brief this
    issue in their informal opening brief, they have waived any
    challenge to that order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 
    775 F.3d 170
    ,
    177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important
    document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to
    issues preserved in that brief.”).     To the extent Plaintiffs’
    argument in their brief challenging the district court’s denial
    of their motion for a protective order relates to their motion
    for new trial, we find no reversible error.
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-1801, 14-1809, 14-2249

Citation Numbers: 624 F. App'x 110

Judges: Motz, Agee, Davis

Filed Date: 12/15/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024