Umadean Hatch v. NCCIW , 626 F. App'x 436 ( 2015 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6213
UMADEAN HATCH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NCCIW,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00791-CCE-JEP)
Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 21, 2015
Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Umadean Hatch, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Umadean Hatch seeks to appeal the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss
without prejudice her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint against
the North Carolina Correctional Institution for Women. This
court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
Because the pleading deficiencies identified by the district
court may be remedied by the filing of an amended complaint, we
conclude that the order Hatch seeks to appeal is neither a final
order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers’ Local Union 392, 10 F.3d
1064, 1067 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal
for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2