Chase Hunter v. Al Redmer , 625 F. App'x 216 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 15-2102
    CHASE CARMEN HUNTER,
    Petitioner – Appellant,
    v.
    AL REDMER, individually and in his official capacity as
    Commissioner of insurance for Maryland; MARYLAND INSURANCE
    ADMINISTRATION,
    Respondents - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.      James K. Bredar, District Judge.
    (1:15-cv-02047-JKB)
    Submitted:   December 17, 2015             Decided:   December 21, 2015
    Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed in part, affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam
    opinion.
    Chase Carmen Hunter, Appellant Pro Se. John Van Lear Dorsey,
    Assistant Attorney General, Brandy Jessica Gray, OFFICE OF THE
    ATTORNEY   GENERAL  OF   MARYLAND,  Baltimore,  Maryland,  for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Chase       Carmen   Hunter       appeals    the    district         court’s    orders
    denying       her     requests      for    a   temporary      restraining          order     and
    preliminary injunction.               To the extent she seeks to appeal the
    denial of her request for a temporary restraining order, we are
    without jurisdiction to consider her appeal.                              See Virginia v.
    Tenneco, Inc., 
    538 F.2d 1026
    , 1029-30 (4th Cir. 1976).
    We    do     possess       jurisdiction       to     review,         for     abuse   of
    discretion, the district court’s denial of her request for a
    preliminary injunction.               
    28 U.S.C. § 1292
    (a)(1) (2012); League
    of Women Voters of N.C. v. North Carolina, 
    769 F.3d 229
    , 250
    (4th    Cir.       2014).      We    have      reviewed     the    record      and    find    no
    reversible error.            We thus affirm for the reasons stated by the
    district       court.        See    Hunter v.       Redmer,       No.    1:15-cv-02047-JKB
    (E.D. Va. Sept. 4, 2015).
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal in part and affirm in
    part.        We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal    contentions         are    adequately        presented         in   the     materials
    before       this    court   and     argument       would   not     aid      the   decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED IN PART,
    AFFIRMED IN PART
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-2102

Citation Numbers: 625 F. App'x 216

Judges: Diaz, Harris, Hamilton

Filed Date: 12/21/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024