L. Ruther v. Randall Anderson , 624 F. App'x 112 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 15-1963
    L. RUTHER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    RANDALL   ANDERSON;  VICKI   ANDERSON;       STATE     FARM    MUTUAL
    AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.     Frederick P. Stamp,
    Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:14-cv-00073-FPS-JES)
    Submitted:   December 15, 2015             Decided:    December 17, 2015
    Before GREGORY    and   FLOYD,   Circuit   Judges,    and   DAVIS,   Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    L. Ruther, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    L.   Ruther     seeks   to   appeal     the   district      court’s     orders
    dismissing    his    civil   action   and     denying        Ruther’s   motion   to
    recuse the magistrate judge.           The district court referred this
    case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)
    (2012).   In both orders, the magistrate judge recommended that
    relief be denied and advised Ruther that failure to file timely
    objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review
    of a district court order based upon the recommendation.
    The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate
    judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review
    of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have
    been warned of the consequences of noncompliance.                       Wright v.
    Collins, 
    766 F.2d 841
    , 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas
    v. Arn, 
    474 U.S. 140
    (1985).          Ruther has waived appellate review
    by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice.
    Accordingly,    we    deny   Ruther’s       motions     to    proceed   in   forma
    pauperis and to stay, and dismiss the appeal.
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions    are   adequately    presented       in   the     materials    before
    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-1963

Citation Numbers: 624 F. App'x 112

Judges: Gregory, Floyd, Davis

Filed Date: 12/17/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024