Mark Konsavich v. Meeks , 694 F. App'x 168 ( 2017 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6485
MARK JAMES KONSAVICH,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
MEEKS, Warden FCI Williamsburg,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken.
R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01829-RBH)
Submitted: July 27, 2017 Decided: August 1, 2017
Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark James Konsavich, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mark James Konsavich appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate
judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition
without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, although we grant Konsavich leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Konsavich v. Meeks, No. 1:16-cv-01829-RBH
(D.S.C. Mar. 3, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2