LeVance Addison v. Kenny Boone , 684 F. App'x 284 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 16-7625
    LEVANCE ADDISON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    KENNY BOONE, FCSO; WAYNE BIRD, DCSO,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
    Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:16-cv-02855-RBH)
    Submitted: March 30, 2017                                         Decided: April 4, 2017
    Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    LeVance Addison, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    LeVance Addison seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate
    judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing without prejudice his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (2012) complaint for failing to state a claim. This court may exercise jurisdiction
    only over final orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
     (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral
    orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1292
     (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
    Corp., 
    337 U.S. 541
    , 545-47 (1949). Because the deficiencies identified by the district
    court may be remedied by the filing of an amended complaint, we conclude that the order
    Addison seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
    collateral order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 
    10 F.3d 1064
    , 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we deny Addison’s motions to appoint
    counsel, dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, and remand the case to the district
    court with instructions to allow Addison to file an amended complaint. See Goode v.
    Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 
    807 F.3d 619
    , 623-24 (4th Cir. 2015). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED AND REMANDED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-7625

Citation Numbers: 684 F. App'x 284

Judges: Traxler, Wynn, Hamilton

Filed Date: 4/4/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024